felixsalmon

This is not supposed to happen.

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, which exempts sovereign nations from litigation, was enacted to avoid this. It prevents United States courts from attaching the property of foreign countries, a reason you don’t see American creditors seizing Argentine frigates in New York harbor. But in the suit by Elliott and Aurelius, the courts sidestepped this act by ruling that their decision reflected how Argentina should act, without requiring it to pay. If Argentina decides not to pay the new debt, it does not have to pay the old debt. Still, the spirit of the act seems violated. And it is bad news when United States judges are seen as controlling the destinies of foreign countries.

Steven Davidoff provides an absolutely excellent one-stop primer on Elliott vs Argentina

In Court Battle, a Game of Brinkmanship With Argentina - NYTimes.com

(via felixsalmon)

If a government wants money, it can sell bonds or raise taxes. It can also just start pointing to stuff and saying: This is now ours.

That’s what Argentina did this week with YPF, a domestic oil company that’s owned by a Spanish firm called Repsol.

This week, Argentina’s government basically said to Repsol: “That oil company you own in our country? We’re going to take it away from you.”